| Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: Swiftfox
 Posted: Mar 11, 2007 - 03:14 PM
|
|
Joined: Dec 30, 2006
Posts: 33
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
After I read the licence at the Swiftfox-Page http://getswiftfox.com/ I guess the fellow would agree that swiftfox may become part of the packages of sidux.
Unfortunately that can only be done by a scripting, which reads out the processore type. Nevertheless - after the errors iceweasel has had in the last releases - it looks to me that also other users would like to have a question about swiftfox coming with the du-script. Unfortunately I am not able to write scripts which can read out hardware.
[/url] |
_________________
"Kunst ist schön, macht aber viel Arbeit" Karl Valentin
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Swiftfox
Posted: Mar 11, 2007 - 04:14 PM
|
|
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Posts: 2555
Status: Offline
|
|
| No, swiftfox or other gecko based forks will not become part of sidux. Iceweasel had its catches and we tried hard to fix them as early as possible. The renaming forced upon debian by Mozilla Corp. should be pretty much completed by now and we don't expect further regressions (and are prepared in case they do appear). |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Swiftfox
Posted: Mar 11, 2007 - 04:43 PM
|
|
Joined: Nov 30, 2006
Posts: 588
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
| Iceweasel works just fine, when the maintainer doesnt release it with bugs. No need to add something that isn't maintained by a Debian/sidux dev. |
_________________
Debian Tips My Debian sources.list
"If you can't apt-get something, it isn't useful or doesn't exist"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
