| Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject:
 Posted: Mar 13, 2007 - 01:03 PM
|
|
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
Posts: 1905
Status: Offline
|
|
Preston, why not at least post in the comments section the information about the final sidux release...should not be too hard  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 13, 2007 - 07:57 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 21, 2007
Posts: 188
Status: Offline
|
|
| Why don't you do it? It would take you the same work as it would me. Anyone who followed the link to the site would realize that there was a final release out. If someone wasn't going to follow the link then they aren't going to read the comments either. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 13, 2007 - 07:59 PM
|
|
Joined: Nov 28, 2006
Posts: 4278
Status: Offline
|
|
The comments are clear, it's fine.
thanks for the review Tarential, now it's time to see how sidux takes to the open seas. |
_________________
sidux Maintenance script: dist-upgrade, kernel install, general utilities: smxi
Backup script [using rdiff-backup]: rd-h2.sh
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 15, 2007 - 12:21 PM
|
|
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
Posts: 1905
Status: Offline
|
|
| Perhaps other Linux rags will take the time to do a review of sidux on its merits... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 17, 2007 - 06:36 AM
|
|
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
Posts: 52
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
|
|
| It is a verry good reiview...Very adult mature constructive criticizem....I get very tired of the play-ground NA-NAS from other articales.. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
