sidux.com
Menu

News

Give back
Last 3 Contributions
16-11-2008 10.00
02-11-2008 20.00
31-10-2008 20.00

Donate


Sponsor
hetzner.de

Languages
Preferred language:



Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
snvv
Post subject: CPU utilization & KPowersave  PostPosted: Oct 06, 2008 - 03:21 PM



Joined: May 28, 2007
Posts: 537

Status: Offline
I have a two core processor but in kpawersave information dialog the frequencies of Processor 1 & 2 are always the same.

I think in single threatted application CPU 1 should be max and CPU 2 low.

Is that a bug of Kpowersave or what?

Thank you
sn
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
slh
Post subject: RE: CPU utilization & KPowersave  PostPosted: Oct 06, 2008 - 03:46 PM



Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Posts: 2555

Status: Offline
Only very current CPU series allow frequency scaling the cores individually, older models can only set one common frequency for all cores.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
snvv
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 06, 2008 - 05:59 PM



Joined: May 28, 2007
Posts: 537

Status: Offline
Thank you slh
It is a quite new CPU (AMD ATHLON 64 X2 4850E).
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
dsmithhfx
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 06, 2008 - 08:42 PM



Joined: May 02, 2008
Posts: 124

Status: Offline
I have the same cpu. Conky displays different frequencies for the two cores almost constantly. The limitation may be with kpowersave.

Perhaps kpowersave reports the current, scaled max frequency (which seems to be the same for both cores), rather than actual frequency per core?
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Ge0rgy
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 07, 2008 - 10:28 AM



Joined: Dec 04, 2006
Posts: 549

Status: Offline
i think i should add, that AFAIK athlon64 - labeled processors still are K8-Cores, which are far from being new.

The newer K10-Cores (Phenom) got some advanced power-saving features. The dual-Core version of those (codename Kuma) seems to be eitehr cancelled or at least delayed until the 45nm process is ready...

Although i believe that even K8s must be able to clock the cores differently, but new processor != new core.

my few cent..

greetings,
me
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
snvv
Post subject:   PostPosted: Oct 07, 2008 - 12:26 PM



Joined: May 28, 2007
Posts: 537

Status: Offline
Thank you all for your answers and sorry for the late reply (I had an accident).

dsmithhfx should be right. When KPowersave shows max frequency in both cpu's I can open & run matlab at very reasonable speed which means one cpu was not at max frequency.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2007 The PNphpBB Group
Credits
 
Logos and trademarks are the property of their respective owners, comments are property of their posters, the rest is © 2006-2008 by sidux e.V., 10407 Berlin, Kniprodestr. 104. sidux e.V. is a Berlin, Germany based non-profit foundation. Consult Impressum and Legal Terms for details. sidux™ is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license and other compatible licenses.
powered by Zikula & Zafenio