| Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject:
 Posted: Feb 18, 2007 - 06:26 PM
|
|
Joined: Dec 01, 2006
Posts: 445
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
I don't know nano, so i can't vote pro or con. But what I don't understand is why it is so important whether a packet comes with the release or not. It is pretty easy to install nano, or mcedit or whatever after the first apt-get update is done.
Gruß
oduffo
P.S. Being curious now, I'm going to install nano now. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 19, 2007 - 04:18 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 17, 2007
Posts: 7
Location: Gold Coast, NSW, Aus
Status: Offline
|
|
That is assuming that all your networking is up & you did not have to edit anything before hand, via an editor 
It's a moot point really, vi, nano, etal. I prefer nano simply because I am used to it now, & can edit basic scripts quickly with it. But Vi is a very fine editor geared more towards the "Power User". I used to use it years ago on the Amiga & it was an invaluable tool for programming & has only got better.
my 2c |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 22, 2007 - 05:09 PM
|
|
Joined: Dec 06, 2006
Posts: 219
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
|
|
|
oduffo wrote:
I don't know nano, so i can't vote pro or con. But what I don't understand is why it is so important whether a packet comes with the release or not. It is pretty easy to install nano, or mcedit or whatever after the first apt-get update is done.
Gruß
oduffo
P.S. Being curious now, I'm going to install nano now.
It's also easy to install totem instead of kaffeine. But in the live cd (that you may need to use without internet connection) there is kaffeine and most people probably won't be happy with totem instead of kaffeine. So I was wondering if people prefers nano or mcedit  |
_________________
sidux-it
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 23, 2007 - 07:10 AM
|
|
Joined: Dec 05, 2006
Posts: 40
Status: Offline
|
|
It was nice to have nano.
I totally miss it! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 23, 2007 - 02:49 PM
|
|
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
Posts: 1705
Location: Germany / NRW
Status: Offline
|
|
| I'd like to see nano as default, too |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 23, 2007 - 04:14 PM
|
|
Joined: Dec 01, 2006
Posts: 481
Location: NYC/NJ Shore area
Status: Offline
|
|
| I dont like mcedit...but thats me. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 24, 2007 - 04:12 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
| I vote nano as well. Easiest for first time users I'd say |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 25, 2007 - 08:31 PM
|
|
Joined: Dec 01, 2006
Posts: 937
Location: DE, near Hamburg
Status: Offline
|
|
| I have used pico/nano a long time myself before I discovered the ease with vim. So yes, I vote for adding it to the cd. Though a real beginner might prefer mcedit. |
_________________
Susan | Hw:  | "Chaos"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 27, 2007 - 04:48 AM
|
|
Joined: Dec 04, 2006
Posts: 1628
Location: England
Status: Offline
|
|
Nano is always one of the first things I'm using when I first install a distro and I was suprised it wasn't there with sidux.
The only other console text editor I know how to use is vi and that's just plain wierd.
I'm sure whever created it made up the keyboard commands as a joke and forgot to change them. |
_________________
sidux 32 & 64 | Parsix | Mandriva Cooker
repository of shame - compiz fusion repo for sidux/debian | 32-bit | 64-bit
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 28, 2007 - 02:56 AM
|
|
Joined: Dec 01, 2006
Posts: 937
Location: DE, near Hamburg
Status: Offline
|
|
| Guess how I was surprised when I today looked at Sabayon and - no vi, no vim... no mc... Luckily I remembered those four letters n a n o . |
_________________
Susan | Hw: | "Chaos"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
